This web page provides general information on lists of chemicals of proliferation concern put together by international frameworks, intergovernmental organizations, and national authorities.
International frameworks. A number of international frameworks contribute to a coordinated multilateral effort to stem the proliferation of chemical weapons (CW) and promote chemical disarmament. To serve their purpose, these frameworks contain lists of chemicals that can be employed as chemical warfare agents, i.e. the toxic chemicals on which chemical weapons are based, or precursors for their synthesis (hereafter referred to as CW-control lists). Some of these CW-control lists are a compilation of exact structures, where each chemical is individually enumerated. Other lists comprise both exact structures as well as families of chemicals identified by a common scaffold with variable substituents.
- Chemical Weapons Convention. To support its verification regime and declaration requirements , the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) contains an Annex on Chemicals composed of three schedules: Schedule 1, Schedule 2, and Schedule 3. See our structurally annotated version of the CWC Schedules.
- Australia Group. The Australia Group (AG), an informal coalition of likeminded states committed to preventing the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons, has compiled the Chemical Weapons Precursors list. See our structurally annotated version of the AG Chemical Weapons Precursors list.
- Wassenaar Arrangement. The Wassenaar Arrangement (WA), the objective of which is to “promoting transparency and greater responsibility in transfers of conventional arms and dual-use goods and technologies,” lists a number chemical agents within its Munitions List 7 (ML7). See our structurally annotated version of the WA ML7.
Intergovernmental organizations and national authorities. To assist the implementation of CWC mandates, support export controls, and promote chemical security in general, other intergovernmental organizations and individual countries incorporate these CW-control lists in their regulations and national legislation, often integrated with the addition of other chemicals. Moreover, further control lists are crafted by international organizations and national authorities. Some examples are listed below.
- World Customs Organization. The World Customs Organization (WCO) maintains a document – the Strategic Trade Control Enforcement Implementation Guide (STCE) – in which, it lists, among other items, many chemicals of strategic concern, including many of those found in the above mentioned international frameworks. See our structurally annotated version of the WCO Strategic Chemicals (STCE, Annex V).
- United States. In the U.S., chemicals that are intended for military applications fall under the jurisdiction of the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) of the U.S. Department of State. They are subject to the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) and are listed in the U.S. Munitions List (USML). Conversely, dual-use chemicals with non-military commercial applications fall under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) of the U.S. Department of Commerce. They are subject to the Export Administration Regulations (EAR), are listed in the Commerce Control List (CCL), and are assigned an Export Control Classification Number (ECCN).
- European Union. In the European Union, control lists of chemicals that are intended for military applications are compiled and maintained by individual Member States. Conversely, dual-use chemicals with non-military commercial applications are subject to the Community Regime for the Control of Exports, Transfer, Brokering and Transit of Dual-use Items (Council Regulation No 428/2009, and subsequent amendments) and are listed in Annex I of the Regulation.
Country-specific norms. In addition to general export control legislation and regulation, several countries have norms that pose additional restrictions on the export of dual-use chemicals to specific countries that pose a particular chemical proliferation risk. For instance, the European Union tightly regulates the export of dual-use chemicals to Syria, within the scope of the restricting measures imposed by Council Regulation (EU) No 36/2012, first issued in 2012 and subsequently subjected to various amendments. Beyond posing additional restrictions on the chemicals already present in the general EU export control lists, this EU regulation comprises additional lists of dual-use chemicals that, although being widely used in chemical industry for non-military purposes, are of concern for their possible role as precursors for the synthesis of chemical warfare agents when exported to Syria.